Walgreens prescriptions added to San Francisco’s opioid epidemic: Judge

Walgreens prescriptions added to San Francisco’s opioid epidemic: Judge

(Reuters) — Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. contributed to the opioid epidemic in San Francisco by means of its sale of prescription medicine in the metropolis, a federal choose concluded on Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco mentioned that Walgreens failed to correctly examine suspicious opioid orders for practically 15 decades. The amount the pharmacy chain have to pay will be determined in a afterwards demo.

Walgreens’ pharmacists stuffed hundreds of 1000’s of suspicious opioid prescriptions from 2006 to 2020 with pharmacists not supplied time, staffing or assets to appropriately look into purple flags, Choose Breyer wrote.

San Francisco in 2018 sued Walgreens, as nicely as various drug brands and distributors, in excess of the opioid epidemic in the city, declaring they designed a “public nuisance” by flooding the city with prescription opioids and failing to avert the prescription drugs from staying diverted for unlawful use.

A trial started in April, and all of the defendants other than Walgreens arrived at settlements with the town prior to the courtroom ruled.

Choose Breyer reported San Francisco had revealed that Walgreens’ lax oversight led to illegal drug use that substantially contributed to the opioid epidemic in the metropolis.

Walgreens claimed that it was unhappy with the ruling and intends to appeal.

“We never produced or promoted opioids, nor did we distribute them to the ‘pill mills’ and web pharmacies that fueled this crisis,” Walgreens spokesman Fraser Engerman mentioned.

The opioid epidemic has brought on more than 500,000 opioid overdose deaths more than two many years, according to the U.S. Facilities for Sickness Control and Avoidance. Additional than 3,300 opioid lawsuits have been filed nationally from drug suppliers, distributors and pharmacies, culminating with many of the other organizations – even though not the pharmacies – agreeing to proposed world-wide settlements.

The opioid crisis has hit San Francisco challenging, with opioid-associated crisis place visits tripling from 886 in 2015 to 2,998 in 2020, in accordance to the courtroom ruling.

Paul Geller, an attorney who represented the metropolis in the circumstance, credited San Francisco Town Lawyer David Chiu for operating to keep firms accountable for contributing to “the horrific epidemic in the Bay Location.”

Walgreens was observed liable in 2021 for contributing to the opioid epidemic in a identical trial introduced by two Ohio counties. Walgreens and its co-defendants, CVS Well being Inc. and Walmart, are awaiting a ruling from the Ohio court docket on the amount of money they should fork out to tackle the opioid disaster in those counties.

 

 

Jury finds major pharmacy chains helped fuel opioid epidemic

Jury finds major pharmacy chains helped fuel opioid epidemic

(Reuters) — A federal jury Tuesday found that pharmacy chain operators CVS Health Corp., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Walmart Inc. helped fuel an opioid epidemic in two Ohio counties, in the first trial the companies have faced over the U.S. drug crisis.

After six days of deliberations, jurors in Cleveland federal court concluded that actions by the pharmacy chains helped create a public nuisance that resulted in an oversupply of addictive pain pills and the diversion of those opioids to the black market.

The verdict, which lawyers for the counties confirmed, has the potential to give state and local governments new leverage in their efforts to negotiate settlements that would resolve the thousands of other cases against the pharmacy operators.

“The judgment today against Walmart, Walgreens and CVS represents the overdue reckoning for their complicity in creating a public nuisance,” the plaintiffs’ lawyers said in a joint statement.

Jurors only assessed liability. It is up to U.S. District Judge Dan Polster to decide how much the companies owe to abate, or address, the public nuisance in Ohio’s Lake and Trumbull counties.

He has tentatively scheduled a trial on that question for May 9. The counties’ lawyers have said the costs are potentially $1 billion for each county.

CVS said in a statement that it strongly disagreed with the verdict and planned to appeal, arguing that the court misapplied public nuisance law, which other courts in similar opioid cases have recently declined to apply to drug manufacturers.

“As plaintiffs’ own experts testified, many factors have contributed to the opioid abuse issue, and solving this problem will require involvement from all stakeholders in our health care system and all members of our community,” CVS said.

Representatives for Walgreens and Walmart did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The trial was the first that any pharmacies had faced over an epidemic that U.S. health officials say had by 2019 resulted in nearly 500,000 opioid overdose deaths over the course of two decades.

At trial, lawyers for Lake and Trumbull counties argued that the pharmacies failed to ensure opioid prescriptions were valid and allowed excessive quantities of addictive pain pills to flood their communities.

The pharmacy operators, among the largest in the United States, denied the allegations. They said they took steps to guard against the diversion of pills and blamed others, including doctors, regulators and drug traffickers, for the epidemic.  

The verdict in the Ohio trial followed recent setbacks for plaintiffs pursuing some of the other 3,300 opioid cases filed against drug manufacturers, distributors and pharmacies nationally.

Oklahoma’s top court on Nov. 9 overturned a $465 million judgment against drugmaker Johnson & Johnson, and a California judge this month ruled in favor of four drugmakers in a case brought by several large counties.

Other trials are underway in New York involving drugmakers Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and AbbVie Inc., and in Washington state with the three largest U.S. drug distributors.