Spotify-Joe Rogan backlash widens, but economics back streaming giant’s clout

Spotify-Joe Rogan backlash widens, but economics back streaming giant’s clout

The growing clamor surrounding Spotify (SPOT) took a new turn over the weekend, with at least two more artists vowing to depart the platform over podcaster Joe Rogan — who the streaming giant backed in a statement.

On Sunday, Spotify broke its silence after the company refused to give into Neil Young’s ultimatum to drop “The Joe Rogan Experience” — the most popular podcast on Spotify — over controversies surrounding his stance on COVID-19 vaccinations. The legendary rocker’s music will now be streamed exclusively on SiriusXM, with singer-songwriter Joni Mitchell and Bruce Springsteen guitarist Nils Lofgren also pushing to remove their songs from Spotify. 

Although Spotify promoted “rules of the road” for its policies, and plans to add a content advisory to any podcast episode about COVID-19 — directing listeners to a dedicated COVID-19 Hub to combat misinformation — the company flatly refused calls to “take on the position of a content censor.”

Podcaster Joe Rogan has come under fire for spreading fake vaccine information

Podcaster Joe Rogan has come under fire for spreading fake vaccine information

Amid the furor, data suggests Spotify is backed by the increasingly lucrative economics of streaming, especially as digital media continues its growth, and its massive scale. The effects of similar controversies on Netflix (NFLX), which faced similar outrage over “Cuties” and Dave Chappelle’s comedy special, had a negligible impact on its stock.

According to IFPI’s latest Global Music Report, paid subscription streaming revenues increased by 18.5{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} in 2020. That number is widely expected to come in even higher for 2021.

Spotify leads the way, capturing 31{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} of total U.S. subscribers, followed by Apple Music (AAPL) at 15{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a}, Amazon Music (AMZN) and Tencent (TCEHY) tied at 13{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a}; YouTube Music (GOOGL) rounds out the top five at 8{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a}. 

Streaming revenues have grown by double digits in recent years, according to IFPI's latest Global Music Report

Streaming revenues have grown by double digits in recent years, according to IFPI’s latest Global Music Report

Yet market share alone doesn’t guarantee total power to streaming platforms. Taylor Swift famously pulled her “1985” album, along with the rest of her catalog off of Spotify back in 2014, as a means of protesting artist compensation in the digital era.

Swift eventually rejoined the platform in 2017, but similar issues remain top of mind for musicians struggling to profit from Spotify’s ‘pro rata’ model in which users’ monthly fees go into one single pot. That money then divided and distributed by the total number of streams, with Spotify receiving roughly 30{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} of the total subscriber’s fee.

Critics of the model say it alienates smaller artists who don’t have the backing of a big label, and takes power away from the consumer, who has no say as to where his or her money lands.

The model has also been accused of being outdated, created at a time when listening habits were drastically different, and streaming was fairly unproven. 

Flash forward several years, and streaming is one of the main forms of audio consumption. Spotify boasts an impressive 381 million users across more than 184 countries and markets.

“Streaming has provided stability…the business has become predictable.”Guillermo Page, former record label executive and professor

Streaming royalties: By the numbers

According to Spotify, 184,500 artists generated over $1,000 in royalties in 2020, with 870 artists generating over $1,000,000. 

However, it’s important to note that Spotify doesn’t directly pay out its artists or songwriters — hence the key word, “generated.” Rather, payments go through the rights holders (record label, distributors, aggregators, or collecting societies), which then pay out the respective parties. 

Although every agreement is different, Spotify says it pays out roughly 2/3 of every dollar it makes through subscribers and advertisers. It has paid more than $23 billion in royalties to music rights holders as of 2020, (including $5 billion in just 2020 alone, up from $3.3 billion in 2017.)

To break it down even further, once the royalties are in the hands of the rights holders, the money is then divided into two buckets: recording (the recordings of the actual songs) and publishing (the copyrights for songwriting and composition, such as lyrics and melodies.) 

Although publishing rights are often not worth as much as actual recordings, they can still lead to a significant amount of revenue over time with radio play, advertising, movie licensing and more.

However, some big artists are crafting their own lucrative deals in ways that circumvent the current compensation model. Just last month, Bruce Springsteen sold both his master recordings and publishing rights to Sony Music in a deal reportedly worth north of $500 million.

And last May, The Red Hot Chili Peppers sold the rights to its song catalog for a reported $150 million, followed by Bob Dylan, who sold over 600 copyrights to Universal Music Group in a deal reportedly valued at over $300 million. Meanwhile, Stevie Nicks sold a majority stake in her songwriting for a reported $100 million.

Guillermo Page, a former record label executive who worked for Sony and Universal, previously told Yahoo Finance that “streaming has provided stability.”

“The key is that the business has become predictable,” according to Page, who now teaches in the music program at the University of Miami.

Investors “can trust in the future of the business because it’s growing. When you eliminate the uncertainty, it opens up a new door for investors to come in and snap those assets,” he added.

Why Spotify is ‘growing up’

Bottom line? Streaming balloons the value of songs and records which make platforms necessary for artists. 

Not every artist will see the same cash flow, and the biggest ones have the most power, but up-and-comers need the exposure that streaming provides. Despite the bad press generated by the departures of Young, Mitchell and others, experts surmise that, ultimately, Spotify will “be fine” in the long run.

Ola Sars, founder and CEO of B2B music streaming company Soundtrack Your Brand, told Yahoo Finance during a recent interview that other media giants from YouTube (GOOGL) to Facebook (FB) have gone through their own public reckonings when it comes to platform scrutiny — and have come out relatively unscathed on the other side.

“I personally don’t think that paying subscribers will leave a platform because there’s one program that is being disputed…[Spotify] has been through this before, so has all of the other media platforms, and consumers kept paying the bill,” the executive said. 

“This is probably not the only situation where certain artists don’t like other types of content…this will be day-to-day business for Spotify [and they will handle] it like any other media company moving forward,” he added.

Alexandra is a Producer & Entertainment Correspondent at Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter @alliecanal8193

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit

China Tightens Political Control of Internet Giants | Business News

China Tightens Political Control of Internet Giants | Business News

By JOE McDONALD and ZEN SOO, AP Organization Writers

BEIJING (AP) — The ruling Communist Occasion is tightening political manage about China’s world-wide-web giants and tapping their wealth to spend for its ambitions to minimize reliance on U.S. and European technological know-how.

Anti-monopoly and facts security crackdowns commencing in late 2020 have shaken the field, which flourished for two many years with little regulation. Trader jitters have knocked more than $1.3 trillion off the whole sector value of e-commerce platform Alibaba, video games and social media operator Tencent and other tech giants.

The party says anti-monopoly enforcement will be a precedence as a result of 2025. It says competitors will help create work and increase residing specifications.

President Xi Jinping’s government appears to be very likely to stay the class even if financial progress suffers, say businesspeople, legal professionals and economists. “These companies are planet leaders in their sectors in innovation, and however the management is eager to squash them all,” stated Mark Williams, chief Asia economist for Money Economics.

Political Cartoons

The crackdown demonstrates Xi’s public emphasis on reviving the party’s “original mission” of primary financial and social advancement, claimed Steve Tsang, a Chinese politics specialist at the School of Oriental and African Scientific tests in London. He stated it could also aid Xi politically if, as predicted, he pursues a 3rd 5-yr time period as get together chief.

Chinese leaders do not want to reimpose immediate management of the overall economy but want private sector providers to align with ruling social gathering ideas, stated Lester Ross, head of the Beijing place of work of regulation firm WilmerHale.

“What they are apprehensive about is organizations finding far too large and far too independent of the party,” explained Ross.

Chinese online companies and their billionaire founders, like Alibaba Group’s Jack Ma and Tencent Holdings’ Pony Ma, are amongst the most significant international accomplishment tales of the past two a long time. Alibaba is the greatest e-commerce organization, even though Tencent operates the well known WeChat messaging services.

But celebration programs emphasize robots, chips and other hardware, so these businesses are rushing to exhibit their loyalty by shifting billions of pounds into all those.

The ruling party’s marketing campaign is prompting warnings the earth could decouple, or split into individual markets with incompatible technological innovation. Solutions from China would not purpose in the United States or Europe, and vice versa. Innovation and efficiency would undergo.

U.S. curbs on Chinese access to telecom and other technologies have not served.

Alibaba mentioned it will devote $28 billion to establish operating procedure computer software, processor chips and community technologies. The business has pledged $1 billion to nurture 100,000 builders and tech startups in excess of the following a few several years.

Very last calendar year, Tencent promised to make investments $70 billion in digital infrastructure. Meituan, an e-commerce, shipping and delivery and services platform, raised $10 billion to acquire self-driving cars and robots.

Chinese officials identify the campaign imposes an economic value but are unwilling to talk up, mentioned Tsang. “Who is going to stand up and say to Xi Jinping, your policy is likely to be unsafe to China?”

Buyers, lots of burned by the drop in technology shares, are trying to keep their dollars on the sidelines. Tencent’s industry capitalization of $575 billion is down $350 billion from its February peak, a drop equal to a lot more than the full value of Nike Inc. or Pfizer Inc.

CEO Masayoshi Son of Japan’s Softbank Team — an early investor in Alibaba — mentioned on Aug. 11 he will put off new China discounts. Softbank invested $11 billion in experience-hailing service Didi Global, whose share price has fallen by just one-third given that its U.S. stock sector debut on July 30.

The crackdown commenced in November when Beijing ordered Ant Team, which grew out of Alibaba’s Alipay on-line payments services, to postpone its inventory current market debut in Hong Kong and Shanghai. The firm, which delivers on-line financial savings and financial investment products and services, was instructed to scale back its ideas and to put in lender-design methods to vet borrowers and take care of lending pitfalls. Industry analysts slice forecasts of Ant’s expected stock market place value.

Meanwhile, Xi’s govt is tightening control around knowledge gathered by private businesses about the public — particularly at Alibaba and Tencent, which have hundreds of tens of millions of buyers. China’s leaders see details about its 1.4 billion individuals as a resource for attaining insight into the public and economic system — and a opportunity safety possibility in non-public fingers.

A regulation that normally takes result Nov. 1 establishes stability specifications, prohibits organizations from disclosing info devoid of buyer authorization and tells them to restrict how considerably they collect. Not like facts safety legal guidelines in Western nations, the Chinese regulations say almost nothing about limiting government or ruling social gathering entry to private data.

Beijing also is accused of making use of its stockpile of data about the community in a campaign of repression towards Uyghurs and other largely Muslim minorities in China’s northwestern location of Xinjiang.

“Pretty lax” till a few months ago, China has become “one of the most energetic and forceful jurisdictions in regulating the digital economic system,” wrote Angela Zhang, an anti-monopoly specialist at the University of Hong Kong legislation university, in a paper this month.

In April, Alibaba was fined 18.3 billion yuan ($2.8 billion) for offenses that bundled prohibiting vendors that wanted to use its platforms from working with Alibaba’s rivals.

Units of Alibaba, Tencent, reside-streaming web page Kuaishou, microblogging system Sina Weibo and social media internet site Xiaohongshu also have been fined for distributing sexually suggestive stickers or small videos of children. Tencent’s tunes company was ordered to conclusion exclusive contracts with providers.

Beijing is also working with the crackdown to narrow China’s politically delicate wealth gap by pushing tech giants to share their prosperity with staff members and buyers.

Didi, Meituan and other delivery and journey-hailing enterprises were being purchased in May perhaps to cut fees charged to motorists and strengthen their positive aspects and safety. Meituan CEO Wang Xing promised to donate $2.3 billion to environmental and social initiatives. Tencent’s Ma pledged $2 billion to charity.

Alibaba has promised to devote 100 billion yuan ($15.5 billion) on job generation, rural advancement and other initiatives to assist Xi’s “common prosperity” marketing campaign.

This sort of earnings redistribution designs are “reminiscent of the mass mobilization and populist strategies” of the 1950s and ’60s beneath then-chief Mao Zedong, Zhang wrote.

Soo documented from Singapore.

Copyright 2021 The Involved Push. All legal rights reserved. This material may not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.