3 Side Jobs That Can Make an Extra $1,000 a Month in Little Time

3 Side Jobs That Can Make an Extra ,000 a Month in Little Time
  • You don’t have to choose between a side gig and family time. Here are four side gigs that take only 10 hours a week or less.
  • You can make up to $300 narrating a three-hour audiobook, and up to $140 per hour organizing closets.
  • You can also make up to $100 per post as a nano-influencer with less than 1,000 followers.
  • Read more stories from Personal Finance Insider.

Whether you’re short on your holiday shopping budget or looking to quickly build an emergency savings fund, it’s always nice to have a little extra cash on hand.

It may be daunting to pick up a side gig, especially if your day job is already demanding. If your side gig causes you to spend less time with your kids, partner, or friends, it’s easy to become resentful.

That’s why we found three side jobs that can earn you $1,000, working 10 hours per week or less.

1. Audiobook narrator

It’s time to pour yourself a cup of tea and find a quiet room to read a book. Sounds like a relaxing job, right?

On sites like ACX or Voices.com, audiobook narrators can earn up to $300 for a three-hour recording. You’ll need a podcasting microphone, which you can find on Amazon for $47. 

Once you get the hang of audiobook narration, you can hone your skills and become a voice actor. According to Voices.com, a trained voice actor can make up to $10,000 for a single national TV commercial.

2. Closet organizer

Can’t stop scrolling on #CleanTok? Put those cleaning and organizing skills to good use by helping people declutter their closets. Even Kim Kardashian West got her start as a celebrity closet organizer.

Closet organizers get paid $70 to $140 per hour, and, on top of that, you can negotiate a package deals.

Let’s say a client has a large garage packed with clutter, plus a closet full of clothes that don’t fit anymore. You can negotiate a $400 flat fee to work on both areas, plus throw in extra services like photo digitization or scrapbooking to help your client take care of their most precious memories.

If your client has good taste in clothes, you can offer to take their clothes to a consignment store or start an eBay page for them for an extra charge.

3. Content creator

You don’t need to have a ton of followers to cash in on the content creator train. 

These days, brands are relying on customers who buy their products to take great photos that they can repurpose on social media. In the age of digital media, brands need user-generated content (UGC) that looks natural and organic.

There are sites like Izea.com that connect brands with content creators (a fancy word for someone who takes pictures while using a product) to get UGC.

Depending on the brands you connect with, all you need to do is take a photo or video of a shirt, toothbrush, cookies, or whatever the brand sells.

While it definitely pays to have a large following, Izea’s FAQ page says it’s also paying nano-influencers who have anywhere from 100 to 1,000 followers up to $100 per post.

Insurance rates soar to cover M&A boom

Insurance rates soar to cover M&A boom

(Reuters) — The cost of insurance to cover problems involving mergers and acquisitions has nearly doubled in just two years, underwriters and brokers say, after an explosion of global dealmaking during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Potential buyers take out insurance to protect against issues such as misrepresentation by a target of its performance or order book, while sellers buy cover to ensure a clean exit.

After years of falling rates due to tough competition, 2021 was the first in which M&A insurance rates have risen since the market began more than two decades ago, said Andrew Johnson, director of M&A at broker Paragon.

Some in the insurance industry said a lack of due diligence has led to a spike in claims, while the M&A boom has translated into steeply higher premiums.

“From August/September last year, we saw incredible deal volumes. That has encouraged insurers to raise rates,” said James Swan, a partner at insurance broker McGill and Partners.

Global M&A activity hit a record $4.33 trillion in the first nine months of 2021, leaping 97{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} from $2.2 trillion scored in the first nine months of a pandemic-hit 2020, as companies positioned themselves for life after COVID-19.

The M&A insurance market has risen to more than $5 billion from less than $3 billion a year ago, Mr. Swan said, adding that a contract he was working on in Europe was priced at around 1.9{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} of the cover available, up from around 1{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} a couple of years ago.

Caroline Rowlands, an executive director at insurance broker Howden, said rates for some deals in Britain had risen to 1.5{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} of the cover provided, from 1{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} previously.

And William Monat, global head of transactional liability at insurer Mosaic, said rates for some U.S. deals had risen to around 4{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} of cover from below 3{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} previously.

Where M&A insurance had previously been bought predominantly by private equity firms, corporates are increasing the amount of cover they buy, industry sources say.

And COVID-19 has led to claims coming through sooner, said Rowan Bamford, president of Liberty Global Transactions Solutions.

“With the pandemic and issues round doing proper diligence on businesses, perhaps there’s been some corner-cutting on process,” he said, adding that buyers were not able to visit businesses easily due to restrictions, while competition for deals may have encouraged haste.

The time to complete due diligence was sometimes compressed by more than half, Liberty said in a recent report.

Adrian Furlonge, partner at Hemsley Wynne Furlonge, said that on a couple of M&A deals, the broker had received notification of a possible claim very soon after closing, suggesting there may have been insufficient research in advance.

“Everybody has been doing too much in too small a timeframe,” Mr. Furlonge said.

Manufacturing and health care are among the sectors that have seen a large number of claims, industry sources said, with workforce and supply chain problems meaning companies could not always produce what they had promised.

Most M&A insurance disputes are settled behind closed doors and only become public if arbitration fails. But that has not yet arisen for claims since the pandemic began, sources said.

 

Asia Stocks Follow Wall Street Lower as Rally Cools | Business News

Asia Stocks Follow Wall Street Lower as Rally Cools | Business News

By JOE McDONALD, AP Business Writer

BEIJING (AP) — Asian stock markets followed Wall Street lower Friday as a rally cooled and investors waited for U.S. inflation data that might influence a Federal Reserve decision on when to roll back economic stimulus.

Shanghai, Tokyo, Hong Kong and Sydney retreated.

Wall Street’s benchmark S&P 500 index fell after three days of gains. More than three-quarters of companies in the index closed lower.

Investors looked ahead to U.S. consumer price data for November. Fed officials, due to meet next week, said earlier they were ready to take action if needed to cool inflation, which hit a 30-year high in October.

Political Cartoons

Traders were “potentially taking some risks off the table” while they wait for the numbers, said Yeap Jun Rong of IG in a report.

The Shanghai Composite Index lost 0.3{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} to 3,662.72 and the Nikkei 225 in Tokyo shed 0.4{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} to 28,609.84. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong retreated 0.5{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} to 24,138.40.

The Kospi in Seoul gave up 0.6{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} to 3,011.44 and Sydney’s S&P-ASX 200 was 0.5{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} lower at 7,346.00.

New Zealand and Southeast Asian markets also declined.

On Wall Street, the S&P 500 fell 0.7{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} to 4,667.45. The Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped less than 1 point to 35,754.69. The Nasdaq lost lost 1.7{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} to 15,517.37.

The S&P 500 had gained 3.6{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} over the previous three days after the chief White House medical adviser said the omicron variant might not be as dangerous as the earlier delta. That eased fears of more restrictions on travel and business.

Technology stocks and a mix of retailers and other companies that rely on direct consumer spending weighed the most on the S&P 500. Chipmaker Nvidia fell 3.4{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a}, while Tesla slid 6.1{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} for the biggest drop in the index.

Travel-related companies slipped after spending the last few days gaining ground. Carnival fell 1.7{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a} and United Airlines fell 1.8{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a}.

Health-related stocks rose. Pfizer, which is touting the potential benefits of a vaccine booster against the omicron variant, rose 1.3{1b90e59fe8a6c14b55fbbae1d9373c165823754d058ebf80beecafc6dee5063a}.

The Labor Department reported that the number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits plunged last week to the lowest level in 52 years.

In energy markets, benchmark U.S. crude gained 7 cents to $71.01 per barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract fell $1.42 on Thursday to $70.94. Brent crude, the price basis for international oils, advanced 8 cents to $74.50 per barrel in London. It lost $1.40 the previous session to $74.42.

The dollar was little-changed at 113.49 yen. The euro gained to $1.1301 from $1.1289.

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

DeFi resolving the five flaws of traditional finance, book review

DeFi resolving the five flaws of traditional finance, book review

Writing a book on decentralized finance is a bit like describing a riddle, wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma, to borrow from Winston Churchill. First, one must summarize the origins of modern decentralized finance, then the mechanics of the blockchain technology that provides the sector’s backbone, and only then do you arrive at DeFi’s infrastructure. It all should be done in 191 pages, too, including glossary, notes and index. It is not an undertaking for the faint of heart.

Fortunately, the authors of DeFi and the Future of Finance — Duke University finance professor Campbell Harvey, Dragonfly Capital general partner Ashwin Ramachandran, and Fei Labs founder Joey Santoro — were up to the task. After recapitulating the “five flaws of traditional finance” — inefficiency, limited access, opacity, centralized control and lack of interoperability — they go on to explain how DeFi improves upon the status quo.

Take the problem of centralized control. Governments and large institutions hold a “virtual monopoly” over the money supply, rate of inflation, as well as “access to the best investment opportunities,” wrote the authors. DeFi with its open protocols and immutable properties “upends this centralized control.”

As for how DeFi answers traditional finance’s opacity shortcoming: “All [DeFi] parties are aware of the capitalization of their counterparties and, to the extent required, can see how funds will be deployed,” which mitigates counterparty risk. As goes inefficiency, “A user can largely self-serve within the parameters of the smart contract” in a decentralized application by exercising a put option, for instance.

What about traditional finance’s failing in limited access? DeFi gives underserved groups like the world’s unbanked population direct access to financial services, wrote the authors, offering yield farming as an example, a DeFi process where users are rewarded for staking capital in the form of a governance token that makes them, in effect, part-owners of the platform, “a rare occurrence in traditional finance.”

The authors also described the ways that DeFi protocols can be layered atop one another (i.e., DeFi’s composability, sometimes referred to as “DeFi Legos”), which helps to deal with the interoperability deficit. Once a base infrastructure has been established (to create a synthetic asset, for instance), “any new protocols allowing for borrowing or lending can be applied. A higher level would allow for attainment of leverage on top of borrowed assets.”

Taking a deep dive

Chapter 6 explores eight leading DeFi protocols in depth: MakerDAO, Compound, Aave, Uniswap,Yield, dYdX, Synthetic, and Set Protocol. Each section is accompanied with a very useful table, where the first column describes how traditional finance solves a particular problem, and the second column how a specific DeFi protocol deals with that problem.

For example, in Table 6.3, “Problems that Aave Solves,” the first row deals with “centralized control.” In the incumbent finance system, “borrowing and lending rates [are] controlled by institutions,” whereas in the DeFi approach, Column 2, “Aave interest rates are controlled algorithmically.”

Related: Tech transformation: Don Tapscott’s ‘Platform Revolution’ book review

Traditional finance provides only “limited access” within its legacy systems. That is, “only select groups have access to large quantities of money for arbitrage or refinance” (Row 2, Column 1), while within the Aave protocol, “flash loans democratize access to liquidity for immediately profitable enterprises.”

The third row focuses on “inefficiency,” specifically “suboptimal rates for borrowing and lending due to inflated costs” in traditional finance, while Aave’s solution (Row 3, Column 2) is “algorithmically pooled and optimized interest rates.”

Novel risks

The authors were careful to remind readers that “all innovative technologies introduce a new set of risks.” In the case of DeFi, these are abundant, including smart contract, governance, oracle, scaling, DEX custodial, environmental and regulatory risks.

“Software is uniquely vulnerable to hacks and developer malpractice,” the authors wrote, while recent hacks of bZx and DForce “demonstrate the fragility of smart contract programming.”

Among these new threats, “oracle risk” looms particularly large. DeFi protocols require access to accurate, secure price information to ensure that actions such as liquidations and prediction market resolutions work smoothly. “Fundamentally, oracles aim to answer the simple question: How can off-chain data be securely reported on chain?” Yet, all online oracles as currently constituted “are vulnerable to front-running, and millions of dollars have been lost to arbitrageurs,” they wrote, adding:

“Until oracles are blockchain native, hardened, and proven resilient, they represent the largest systemic threat to DeFi today.”

Raising up “marginalized groups”

“This book is fundamentally about financial democracy,” co-author Harvey told Cointelegraph. The book’s preface, written by no less a personage as Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin, reminds readers that “financial censorship continues to be a problem for marginalized groups,” especially in the developing world — which is why DeFi is important.

The average reader might find this book a bit heavy on the technical side, however. Graphics include superlinear and logistic/sigmoid bonding curves, for example, which might go over some heads. Those who want to learn how a flash loan actually works, though, will find it useful; the book’s glossary is comprehensive and helpful.

Related: DeFi: A comprehensive guide to decentralized finance

It would have been illuminating, however, to learn more about how DeFi was beginning to actually change the world, such as offering banking to the unbanked, or insurance to the uninsured — though perhaps this is beyond the scope of the book.

One might ask what percentage of the world’s “unbanked population” is actually taking advantage of “yield farming,” a still-esoteric DeFi process that the authors nonetheless cite as an example of the way DeFi provides access “to the many who need financial services but whom traditional finance leaves behind.” Not too many, one guesses.

Unfortunately, much of the focus in the DeFi world today still seems to be on ways to gain leverage or arbitrage between markets rather than solving the problems of the global poor. Nor does the book devote much ink to defending DeFi from critics in the general business press such as The Wall Street Journal, which noted in September that DeFi was “bringing casino capitalism to the crypto masses.”

That is not the authors’ vision of the future. On the contrary, they see in DeFi “the scaffolding of a shining new city. […] Finance becomes accessible to all. Quality ideas are funded no matter who you are. A $10 transaction is treated identically to a $100 million transaction. Savings rates increase and borrowing costs decrease as the wasteful middle layers are excised. Ultimately we see DeFi as the greatest opportunity of the coming decade and look forward to the reinvention of finance as we know it.”

These are worthy goals, though unlikely to be realized in the immediate future. Until then, this book should be of interest to anyone looking to unravel DeFi’s inner workings.